|
Assessment:
"Assessment is the systematic collection, review, and use of information about
educational programs undertaken for the purpose of improving student learning
and development." (Palomba & Banta, 1999)
Assessment Audit: see Curriculum Mapping
Course
Embedded Assessment:
The use of a classroom assignment or activity undertaken as a mode of
assessment. This can be an effective, yet timesaving method of information
gathering if clearly related to a student outcome.
Curriculum Mapping:
Determining where in the curriculum an objective is taught, reinforced, or
practiced. The Map typically includes the specific course, how the objective is
being taught, and how that objective is measured in the classroom (studio/lab)
setting.
Direct
Measure of Learning Outcome:
Students demonstrate an expected learning outcome (Allen, 2002). Direct Measures
directly evaluate student work. For example, exams, projects, interaction with a
patient, or a musical performance may serve as direct measures (Walvoord, 2004).
Also see Indirect Measure.
Educational Objectives:
Objectives are similar to Learning Outcomes, although Outcomes are written more
specifically in terms of what students will be able to demonstrate in terms of
what they can do, or what they know. Objectives include the knowledge, skills,
abilities, capacities, attitudes or dispositions students are expected to
acquire.
Evaluation: The use
of assessment findings (evidence/data) to judge program effectiveness; used as a
basis for making decisions about program changes or improvement.
Formative Assessment:
Designed to give feedback to improve what is being assessed (Allen, 2002).
Formative assessment occurs when teachers feed information back to students in
ways that enable the student to learn better, or when students can engage in a
similar, self- reflective process (Black and Williams1998). (cf.
Summative Assessment)
Goals:
The general aims or purposes of a program and its curriculum. Effective goals
are broadly stated, meaningful, achievable and assessable. Goals provide a
framework for determining the specific educational objectives of a program, and
should be consistent with program and institutional missions.
Holistic Scoring: A
method employing one global, holistic score for a product or performance (Allen,
2002). (cf. Primary Trait Analysis)
Indirect Measure of Learning Outcome:
Students or others report their perception of how well a given learning outcome
has been achieved. This might include asking students or alumni what they
thought they learned, tracking placement in graduate school, or job placement
rates. (Walvoord, 2004)
Learning Outcomes:
Operational statements describing specific student behaviors that show the
acquisition of desired knowledge, skills, abilities, capacities, attitudes or
dispositions. Learning outcomes can be usefully thought of as behavioral
criteria for determining whether students are achieving the educational
objectives of a program, and, ultimately, whether overall program goals are
being successfully met. Outcomes are sometimes treated as synonymous with
objectives, though objectives are usually more general statements of what
students are expected to achieve in an academic program (cf.
Educational Objectives).
NSSE:
acronym for the National Survey of Student Engagement. This national survey is
given to college freshmen and seniors. Results of the NSSE given at MUW can be
found on the MUW website.
Observer Effect:
The degree in which the presence of an observer influences the outcome of an
event.
Outcome: At MUW we
use this term interchangeably with “Student Learning Outcomes.”
Primary Trait Analysis:
Primary Trait Analysis (PTA)
is a particularly powerful device because one can apply it at the level of the
institution, department, curriculum, course, single class, or classroom
assignment (Walvoord and McCarthy, 1990). While most grading tends to be
holistic, PTA breaks assignments into components (primary traits) that are
evaluated separately. When applied to a course (or curriculum), PTA allows us to
deconstruct the course (or curriculum) into parts to foster more meaning
discussions about learning. PTA and Holistic Scoring lend themselves to
Course-Embedded Assessment.
Rubric:
A tool that assists in the evaluation of student work in assessment settings. “A
rubric articulates in writing the various criteria and standards that a faculty
member uses to evaluate student work. It translates informed professional
judgment into numerical ratings on a scale” (Walvoord, 2004).
Standardized Tests:
“National exams used as a direct measure which place the goals, performance,
criteria, and evaluation with an external source, not the instructor.” (Walvoord,
2004)
Summative Assessment:
Designed to provide an evaluative summary. (Allen, 2002). Summative assessment
is the attempt to summarize student learning at some point in time, say the end
of a course. Most standardized tests are summative. They are not designed to
provide the immediate, contextualized feedback useful for helping teacher and
student during the learning process (cf. Formative Assessment).
Teaching Method:
The techniques used to deliver the course content and learning objectives.
Triangulation: The
collection of data through multiple assessment methods and comparison of the
results in order to determine reliability of the information.
|