|
1
|
- Classification Plan Update
- Spring 2005
|
|
2
|
- March 24, 2003 – Staff Classification Committee appointed
|
|
3
|
- Committee’s Goal: get staff input for the development of MUW’s
classification plan
- 14 meetings were held with staff beginning in early fall ’03
|
|
4
|
- The Staff Classification Committee Report submitted to the
administration on 4/23/04
|
|
5
|
- Report recommendations:
- Hire a professional consultant
- Consider the staff salary administration policy created by the
committee
- Create transparent University policies and procedures
- Consider experience and education for base pay
- Base raises on a combination of cost of living, performance and merit
- Implement reward systems and programs
|
|
6
|
- May 6, 2004 Response from the Administration
- Funds not available for outside consultant
- Steps to begin to develop a position classification system on campus
|
|
7
|
- Attract, motivate and retain productive staff members
|
|
8
|
- Define classification categories
- http://www.muw.edu/personnel/classplan.html
|
|
9
|
- Summer ‘04
- Classification Definitions draft developed
- Input received from Unit Managers
|
|
10
|
- Fall ‘04
- Classification spreadsheet developed based on Unit Managers’
recommendations
|
|
11
|
- Group like positions together
- By reviewing job descriptions
- By relying on unit managers’ recommendations
- By making some judgment calls after discussion and sometimes
disagreement
- Maintain “working titles”
|
|
12
|
- Current Working Titles include:
|
|
13
|
- What do these titles mean?
|
|
14
|
- Current working titles also include:
|
|
15
|
- Under the classification plan, every non-faculty position was placed in
one of the classifications.
|
|
16
|
- Every position in a classification may not have met each specific
criterion, but they did meet most of the criteria.
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Summary
- Classification Definitions
- Group similar positions and establish consistent qualifications for
positions
- Are representative of the positions within them
- Provide descriptions that generally apply to each of the positions
- Allow flexibility for positions to have unique responsibilities or
qualifications not stated in the classification description
|
|
19
|
- Summary Continued
- Will require the University to be more disciplined in determining
position titles
- Will not replace “working titles”
- Will appear on job announcements with working title
- Ex: Custodian I – Working Title
- Service Maintenance I - Classification
|
|
20
|
- Include 25 Classifications
- May have I, II, or III designation
- Higher designation, more organizational responsibility
|
|
21
|
- Accounting Service I
- Accounting Service II
- Administrative Assistant I
- Administrative Assistant II
- Cashier I
- Cashier II
|
|
22
|
- Classifications Continued
- Clerk I
- Clerk II
- Coordinator I
- Coordinator II
- Executive Assistant
- Executive Management
|
|
23
|
- Classifications Continued
- Protective Service I
- Protective Service II
- Service Maintenance I
- Service Maintenance II
- Service Maintenance III
|
|
24
|
- Classifications Continued
- Skilled Crafts I
- Skilled Crafts II
- Skilled Crafts III
- Specialist I
- Specialist II
|
|
25
|
- Classifications Continued
- Technical Specialist I
- Technical Specialist II
- Unit Director
|
|
26
|
- Establishes a salary range for each classification
- Reflects a +/-20% range to the average
- Ensures that salary levels for staff positions will over time become
consistent within the classifications
|
|
27
|
- Procedures will be developed to carry out the plan on an ongoing basis.
|
|
28
|
- Reclassifying positions
- Moving from one classification to another
- Reviewing and updating salary ranges
- Addressing other issues that might arise
|