| TITLE: | Promotion of Faculty |
| AUTHOR: | Chief Academic Officer in conjunction with Faculty Senate |
| APPROVAL DATE: | December 6, 2005 |
| EFFECTIVE DATE: | December 6, 2005 |
| PURPOSE: | To establish a university policy concerning the promotion of faculty |
| REVIEWER AND | Chief Academic Officer and Faculty Senate |
| REVIEW DATE: | Fall 2010 and every five years thereafter |
| OPERATING DETAILS: |
1.
To
be promoted in any rank, a faculty member must give
evidence of teaching effectiveness and competent advising, scholarly
and
professional activities, and service to the university and community.
2.
To
be admitted to the rank of instructor, one must have a
master's degree appropriate to the academic discipline and show
potential for
teaching.
3.
*To
be admitted to the rank of assistant professor, one must
have at least a master's degree plus 30 semester hours of graduate
credit
earned in the discipline after the completion of the master's degree
and must
give evidence of teaching effectiveness and competent advising,
scholarly and
professional activities, and service to the university and community.
4.
*To
be admitted to the rank of associate professor, one must
have earned a terminal degree in the appropriate area and have a
minimum of
five years teaching experience at the college or university level with
at least
three years at the rank of assistant professor.
An associate professor has consistently
given evidence of teaching effectiveness and competent advising,
scholarly and
professional activities, and service to the university and community.
5.
*To
be admitted to the rank of professor, one must have a
terminal degree in the appropriate field and a minimum of six years
teaching
experience at the college or university level with at least three years
experience at the rank of associate professor. A professor has
demonstrated
substantial achievement in teaching effectiveness and competent
advising,
scholarly and professional activities, and service to the university
and
community.
6.
*No
promotion in rank is automatic. Faculty may not be
promoted until they have served three years in rank, unless they meet requirements established
at the time
of initial appointment (see Policy # 1302, section 7).
7.
To
be promoted in rank, one must meet the minimum criteria
for employment in the rank as set forth in items 2-5.
8.
To
initiate the
process of promotion and tenure each college will annually appoint or
elect a
College Promotion, Tenure, and Post-Tenure Review Committee, which will
be
limited to Professors and Associate Professors who have tenure.
The dean
and department chairs will not be a part of this committee. The
Committee will
be chaired by a member elected by the Committee. This
Committee will have at least three
members. In cases where a college does
not have three faculty members who meet these qualifications, the dean
will
work with the CAO to appoint faculty members from other colleges to
form a
three-member Committee. In cases where
all faculty members are appointed from outside of the college, the CAO
and the
dean will appoint an advisor from the college who will answer questions
the
committee may have about typical faculty roles and responsibilities
within the
college.
9.
The
Dean in coordination with the CAO will determine
eligibility of faculty members for promotion and/or tenure and will
notify the
individual faculty member of their findings.
10.
Applications
for
promotion will be prepared by the individual faculty member who is
solely
responsible for the content and organization.
The application will be submitted to the Department Chair. As a courtesy, the dean or department chair
may provide some general assistance.
11.
A faculty member's application for promotion
and/or tenure:
a.
Must
clearly address and document proof of
accomplishments in each of the three areas described in Item 12 below
(and on
the standard request for promotion and/or tenure form available in the
office
of the Vice President for Academic Affairs).
b.
Must
include at least three letters of
recommendation, but no more than five, from colleagues and/or other
professional peers (which may include those at other institutions) who
can
address the individual's performance in the areas of professional
activity
referred to in 12 a, b, and c.
c.
Must
include annual evaluations for each year
under consideration for
promotion and/or tenure.
d.
May
include written student evaluations from students
in classes taught during the years under consideration.
e.
Must
include numerical student evaluations. f.
May include peer evaluations and other evidence of quality teaching,
professional development, and service, if submitted by the faculty
member.
12.
Criteria
to be
used in recommendations regarding promotion include the following, with
the
greatest weight being given to the first criterion:
a.
Excellence
in teaching and advising as evidenced by
demonstrated knowledge of the individual's area of academic
appointment,
ability to help students discover that knowledge in substantive and
meaningful
ways, updating knowledge and skills, designing new courses, regularly
revising existing
courses, and university-wide outreach to students including support for
admissions and retention efforts
b.
Quality
and extent of scholarly and professional
activities, which may include research, writing, performing and other
creative
work, publications, presenting papers, professional and scholarly
services,
activity in professional organizations, and grant activity to funding
sources
outside the University.
c.
Quality
and extent of service to the division and the
entire University, which may include committee work; administrative
duties, if
assigned; involvement with student activities; and other means of
maintaining
and improving the ongoing life of the institution. Working with
other
people is essential to the maintenance of a collegial environment; —
therefore,
professional ethics, cooperativeness, resourcefulness and
responsibility will
be considered, as will service to the community at large.
13.
A written recommendation evaluating the
individual's application credentials and the candidate’s portfolio will
be
forwarded by the College’s Promotion, Tenure, and Post-Tenure Review
Committee
to the Dean for review. At the same time, the Department Chair
will
conduct an independent review and prepare a written recommendation
evaluating
the candidate’s portfolio which will be forwarded to the Dean. The Dean will review the candidate’s
portfolio, make an independent recommendation, and forward all
materials
to the Chief Academic Officer. The Chief Academic Officer will
review all
applications for completeness and forward all materials, regardless of
recommendations, to the University Promotion, Tenure, and Post-Tenure
Review
Committee.
14.
A
University
Faculty Promotion, Tenure, and Post-Tenure Review Committee will be
elected/selected each year. Membership will be limited to tenured
faculty
who are full professors, except in units with no full professors.
If a
unit has no full professors, the Dean and CAO will appoint a
representative for
the College. Each Academic Unit will
elect one individual to serve on the committee.
Department Chairs may be elected to serve on this Committee but
they
will be required to recuse themselves from any and all deliberations
involving
a faculty member from their department.
In such cases, the Dean and CAO will appoint a representative
that is a
tenured faculty member first from the college; if one is not available,
a
tenured faculty member will be appointed from outside the college. For the purposes of this policy, the Academic
Units are the four colleges, the Culinary Arts Institute and the
Library.
The Committee will elect a chairperson from its membership.
15.
The
University
Faculty Promotion, Tenure, and Post-Tenure Review Committee will review
and
recommend approval or disapproval of each application for promotion
submitted
to it. For the Committee to recommend
approval, a majority of the committee members must approve.
16.
The
recommendation of the University Faculty Promotion, Tenure, and
Post-Tenure
Review Committee will be forwarded to the Chief Academic Officer, who
will
recommend approval or disapproval to the President. In the event
of an
unfavorable decision from the University Faculty Promotion, Tenure, and
Post-Tenure Review Committee, the faculty member may elect to appeal to
the
Faculty Appeals Committee. The recommendation of the Faculty Appeals
Committee,
whether favorable or unfavorable, will be forwarded to the Chief
Academic
Officer, who will attach the recommendations of the Faculty Appeals
Committee
to those of the University Promotion, Tenure, and Post-Tenure Review
Committee
and will recommend approval or disapproval to the President.
17.
If
the
application is approved by the President, the President will send a
letter to
the candidate stating it is approved, with a copy to the Chief Academic
Officer
and the appropriate Dean and Department Chair. If the application
is
rejected by the President, the President will send a written report of
the
unfavorable decision and the reason(s) for it to the faculty member
concerned,
with a copy to the Chief Academic Officer and the appropriate Dean and
Department Chair.
18.
At
each stage in
the process, the committee or administrator will report their decision
in
writing to the faculty member concerned and to the appropriate Dean and
Department Chair. The reasons for an unfavorable decision will be
described in detail in this report.
19.
By
September 30
of each academic year, the Chief Academic Officer will establish the
date by
which each stage of the process is to be accomplished and inform the
faculty of
those dates.
20.
For
the purposes
of this policy, the Culinary Arts Institute and the Library shall each
be
viewed as a college and the director of these units will fulfill the
responsibilities assigned by this policy to the dean.
21.
*Exceptions
to
these standards may be allowed in accordance with State Board of
Trustees
Policy 402.02 for Faculty Ranking.
Reviewed: 12/19/03, 09/04